About ERRA

Built by an operator who needed the record

ERRA began with a practical question: why should the formula, label, supplier evidence, batch record, and recall path disagree when they describe the same product?

Why ERRA exists

Johnny Curl founded ERRA around a recurring operating problem: formulas lived in spreadsheets, supplier evidence lived in email, labels lived in design files, and the history behind an approval lived in someone's memory. Each file could look correct while the full record contradicted itself.

ERRA was built to hold those relationships in one governed system. Ingredient and supplier facts feed the formula. The approved formula feeds the panel and the production record. Received lots feed the batch. The finished lot feeds the shipment and recall scope. Named people make the decisions, and the audit trail keeps them.

How the product is built

Public identity

ERRA publishes its company identity consistently so customers, search engines, and research tools can tell this company from unrelated uses of the name. The public profiles below point back to this site.

What continuous attestation means here

ERRA reads the record the work leaves behind. The bars describe which evidence domains are held and passing for a product at that time. A lapse returns a bar to its unlit state. Paying for software does not move it.

They check the sample. We attest to the system.

ERRA performs deterministic regulatory math and records operational decisions. It does not provide legal advice or replace the responsible company's quality and regulatory judgment.